CruxSci
Cytogenetics · Evolution

The Incredible Shrinking Chromosome

Is the Y destined to disappear?

Look at any male karyogram and the Y looks like an afterthought: small, stubby, and nothing like the X it pairs with. It was not always this way. The Y started out as a perfectly ordinary chromosome, then spent about 180 million years losing almost everything except the one job it was built for.

By the CruxSci Team··About 10 minutes·Video + interactive timeline
The full story in 3 minutes, narrated.Watch on YouTube ↗

Explore it yourself: the interactive timeline

⤢ Open full screen

In brief

A pair of equals

About 180 million years ago, in a small shrew-like mammal living alongside the dinosaurs, the ancestors of today's X and Y were an ordinary matched pair of autosomes. Same size, same genes, and like every other pair, they lined up at meiosis and swapped segments by crossing over.

Then, on one copy, a duplicate of the gene SOX3 mutated into something new: SRY, a switch that tells the developing gonad to become a testis. Whichever copy carried SRY was now, in effect, a proto-Y. Comparisons across mammal genomes date this to roughly 180 million years ago, in the common ancestor of marsupials and placental mammals. The platypus and echidna, which branched off earlier, have a completely different set of sex chromosomes with no SRY at all.

Older numbers you may have seen. Early studies put the start of X-Y divergence at 240 to 320 million years ago, before the first mammals. That estimate was revised once the platypus genome showed that its sex chromosomes are unrelated to ours. Mammals (in the broad sense) were already around when the therian Y appeared.

Why the Y shrank: life without a partner

Crossing over is how a chromosome repairs itself over evolutionary time. If one copy picks up a damaging mutation, recombination can pair it with a clean copy and let selection sort the good combinations from the bad. To keep SRY and the male-specific genes near it together, the proto-Y gradually stopped crossing over with the X. It did this in blocks, most likely through inversions on the Y, and each block left a signature on the X that geneticists call an evolutionary stratum.

StratumWhen crossing over stoppedWhere it sits on today's X
S1~180 MyaLong arm (Xq), around SOX3
S2130-170 MyaAround the centromere
S380-130 MyaShort arm (the X-added region)
S430-50 MyaDistal Xp
S5~30 MyaDistal Xp, next to PAR1

Once a block stopped recombining, two well-understood processes went to work on the Y copy:

The X did not suffer the same fate because in females it still pairs and recombines with another X. One more twist added material: roughly 80 to 130 million years ago, in the placental ancestor, a block from another chromosome was added to the short arms of both X and Y. Most of today's Xp comes from that X-added region, and most of it then went through the same shutdown on the Y (strata 3 to 5).

The damage, by the numbers

X chromosomeY chromosome
Length~156 Mb~57 Mb (GRCh38); 62.5 Mb complete (T2T-Y, 2023)
Protein-coding genesAbout 800A few dozen distinct genes, many in multiple copies
Ancestral genes keptNearly all19 of more than 600 (about 3%)
Still crosses over with the XOnly at the tips: the pseudoautosomal regions PAR1 (Xp22.33/Yp11.32, about 2.7 Mb) and PAR2

Note what the 3% figure measures: genes, not DNA. The Y is still more than a third the length of the X because much of it is repetitive sequence, including the huge heterochromatic block at Yq12 and the ampliconic regions full of testis-specific gene families. The first complete, telomere-to-telomere sequence of a human Y, published in 2023, added more than 30 million bases that earlier references could not assemble. The Y has sometimes been called a genetic wasteland, but the genes it kept are anything but junk.

Seeing it at the bench: the Y on a karyotype

A routine karyotype usually starts with peripheral blood. Lymphocytes are stimulated to divide, arrested in metaphase, and the chromosomes are G-banded (trypsin, then Giemsa stain). They are then arranged by size, centromere position and banding pattern into 22 autosome pairs, with the sex chromosomes at the end.

The size gap between X and Y is obvious, but the Y is not a speck. It is about the size of the G-group chromosomes (21 and 22) and, like them, acrocentric, though it has no satellites. A few features worth knowing:

The plot twist: losing the Y in a single lifetime

The Y is not only disappearing over evolutionary time. As men age, some of their dividing cells drop the Y entirely, usually through a mis-segregation at cell division. The result is mosaic loss of Y (mLOY): a mix of normal 46,XY cells and 45,X cells that have lost it.

mLOY is the most common acquired chromosome change in human blood. With sensitive genotyping it is detectable in about one in five men in the UK Biobank, and it becomes more common with every decade of age. For years it was dismissed as a harmless quirk, since the Y carries so few genes. That view has changed:

A male karyogram drawn with KaryoSnap in which the Y chromosome has been lost, written 45,X,-Y
The same karyogram before and after the Y drops out: 46,XY becomes 45,X,-Y. In a real sample, only some cells lose it, so the report is written as a mosaic, for example 45,X,-Y[14]/46,XY[6].Open 45,X,-Y in KaryoSnap ↗

This is one of the most common findings in karyotypes from older men. It is often written up as an abnormal result, and technically it is a clonal change, yet on its own it is usually a sign of age rather than of a blood cancer.

Why this matters in the cytogenetics lab. Loss of the Y turns up regularly in bone marrow karyotypes of older men. On its own, and without other evidence, 45,X,-Y in a subset of cells is generally treated as an age-related change rather than proof of a neoplasm. WHO criteria do not count -Y as a sole abnormality as presumptive evidence of MDS. Context is everything: the same finding alongside other clonal changes means something different.

Will the Y disappear completely?

In 2002, geneticists Robert John Aitken and Jennifer Graves did a back-of-the-envelope calculation. If the Y had lost genes at an average rate of about 4.6 per million years, and only a few dozen were left, a straight-line extrapolation said the last of them would be gone in roughly 10 million years. (The "4.6 million years" figure that circulates online is that rate, misread as a deadline.) Graves herself has stressed it was never meant as a prediction.

It is also not a far-fetched idea. Some rodents have already lost the Y completely. Two species of mole vole (Ellobius lutescens and E. tancrei) have no Y and no SRY, and their new sex-determining gene is still unknown. The Amami spiny rat of Japan also lost its Y; there, males are set apart by a small male-specific duplication near the gene SOX9 on an ordinary chromosome, which appears to have taken over SRY's job.

But the evidence from our own lineage points to stability:

The bottom line

The Y is a shadow of the chromosome it once was. It lost around 97% of its ancestral genes, and it keeps losing ground in individual men as they age. But the collapse was front-loaded, the genes that remain are hard to live without, and the chromosome has its own repair system. The Y is small, but it is not in a hurry to leave, and SRY, the gene that started it all, has held its post for about 180 million years.

Frequently asked questions

How old is the human Y chromosome?

The Y and its sex-determining gene SRY arose about 180 million years ago, in the common ancestor of marsupials and placental mammals. Older estimates of 240 to 320 million years were revised after the platypus genome showed that monotreme sex chromosomes evolved separately.

How many genes has the Y lost?

The human Y retains only 19 of the more than 600 genes it once shared with the X, about 3% of its ancestral genes. It also carries a few dozen other genes, many in multiple copies, that are mostly active in the testis.

Is the Y chromosome really going to disappear in 4.6 million years?

No. The widely quoted 2002 estimate was about 10 million years, based on an average loss of roughly 4.6 genes per million years. Later work showed that gene loss on the human Y essentially stopped about 25 million years ago, so a simple straight-line extrapolation does not hold.

What is mosaic loss of Y (mLOY)?

mLOY is the loss of the Y chromosome from a fraction of a man's cells, most often measured in blood. It becomes more common with age and smoking, and it is associated with shorter survival, cancer, Alzheimer's disease and heart failure.

Does a -Y in a bone marrow karyotype mean cancer?

Not by itself. Loss of the Y as the only abnormality in an older man is often age-related, and WHO criteria do not treat it as presumptive evidence of myelodysplastic syndrome. It has to be read in context with morphology and any other clonal findings.

Have any mammals lost the Y entirely?

Yes. Two mole vole species (Ellobius lutescens and E. tancrei) and the Amami spiny rat have no Y chromosome. In the spiny rat, a male-specific duplication near SOX9 on an autosome appears to have replaced SRY.

KaryoSnap · free

Make your own karyogram

Open the 45,X,-Y karyogram from this article, then change the ISCN and build any karyotype you like, drawn with the same photoreal chromosomes as the animation.

Open 45,X,-Y in KaryoSnap ↗
CruxSci membership

Prepare for the ASCP CG exam

Study for the ASCP Technologist in Cytogenetics (CG) certification with CruxSci.

  • Cytogenetics (CG)Available now
  • Molecular Biology (MB)Coming soon
  • Flow Cytometry (SCYM)Coming soon
Become a member
Labs, schools and training partners: looking to prepare your trainees? Email hello@cruxsci.com for more information.

Sources

  1. Cortez D, et al. Origins and functional evolution of Y chromosomes across mammals. Nature 2014;508:488-493.
  2. Lahn BT, Page DC. Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science 1999;286:964-967.
  3. Ross MT, et al. The DNA sequence of the human X chromosome. Nature 2005;434:325-337.
  4. Bellott DW, et al. Mammalian Y chromosomes retain widely expressed dosage-sensitive regulators. Nature 2014;508:494-499.
  5. Hughes JF, et al. Strict evolutionary conservation followed rapid gene loss on human and rhesus Y chromosomes. Nature 2012;483:82-86.
  6. Hughes JF, et al. Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content. Nature 2010;463:536-539.
  7. Rhie A, et al. The complete sequence of a human Y chromosome. Nature 2023;621:344-354.
  8. Rozen S, et al. Abundant gene conversion between arms of palindromes in human and ape Y chromosomes. Nature 2003;423:873-876.
  9. Aitken RJ, Marshall Graves JA. The future of sex. Nature 2002;415:963.
  10. Forsberg LA, et al. Mosaic loss of chromosome Y in peripheral blood is associated with shorter survival and higher risk of cancer. Nature Genetics 2014;46:624-628.
  11. Dumanski JP, et al. Smoking is associated with mosaic loss of chromosome Y. Science 2015;347:81-83.
  12. Dumanski JP, et al. Mosaic loss of chromosome Y in blood is associated with Alzheimer disease. American Journal of Human Genetics 2016;98:1208-1219.
  13. Thompson DJ, et al. Genetic predisposition to mosaic Y chromosome loss in blood. Nature 2019;575:652-657.
  14. Sano S, et al. Hematopoietic loss of Y chromosome leads to cardiac fibrosis and heart failure mortality. Science 2022;377:292-297.
  15. Somatic loss of the Y chromosome is associated with arsenic exposure among Bangladeshi men. International Journal of Epidemiology 2023;52(4):1035. Link
  16. Just W, et al. Absence of Sry in species of the vole Ellobius. Nature Genetics 1995;11:117-118.
  17. Terao M, et al. Turnover of mammal sex chromosomes in the Sry-deficient Amami spiny rat is due to male-specific upregulation of Sox9. PNAS 2022;119:e2211574119.
  18. Pečnerová P, et al. Genome-based sexing provides clues about behavior and social structure in the woolly mammoth. Current Biology 2017;27:3505-3510.